Search This Blog

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Carol Presents I, Claudius

Jacquie’s Email
Hello Literary Ladies! A late yet gentle reminder that the Literature Club of Hastings-on-Hudson will be meeting this Wednesday, January 21, 2026, for Carol’s presentation on I, Claudius by Robert Graves. Yesterday at this time I was sitting on the beach as my sons joined a crowd at the water’s edge watching three manatees frolicking in the waves. Sigh. Air travel is truly an amazing thing.

Please note the change of venue: while Carla continues to move into her new digs, Barbara has graciously offered to host us at her beautiful hilltop home. We will meet at noon for luncheon and Joanna will ring the bell at 1 PM to begin our meeting (if I remember to bring the bell to the meeting as it is currently sitting atop my pile of Literature Club programs in my living room, so there's a 50/50 chance said bell will actually be rung...)

I imagine many of us know I, Claudius from the amazing BBC production which first aired in the US on Masterpiece Theatre in 1977 with its haunting dissonant opening music and extraordinary who’s who of British acting talent. With a desire to re-visit the work in the late 80s, imagining a rip-roaring yarn of intrigue and romance, and before easy access to streaming, I read the book one summer. My memory is of very tiny print and pages and pages of the details of army supplies and tactics and other minutia of history, but we’ll see what Carol has to say!

Please let our hostess know only if you will be unable to attend. I look forward to seeing you all soon! xo Jacquie

Frances’ Minutes The sunny winter light of Barbara’s home cheered the 13 members and 1 associate who met there. Logs were burning in the fireplace. Outside the kitchen window, birds were eating greedily at the feeder. We ate more politely from the buffet set out on the kitchen table.

Joanna rang the bell promptly at 1 PM. We began with our recommendations. Thanks to Connie and the Persephone Newsletter, Frances read Dorothy Whipple’s Someone at a Distance. Whipple was a mid-20th century British writer whose books went out of print. Persephone, both a bookstore and a publisher in England, has taken up the work of reprinting works of excellent, forgotten writers, especially women. Turns out Barbara Pym isn’t the only forgotten gem.

Two recommendations from Sharon: The Axeman’s Carnival, by Catherine Chidgey, written from the point of view of a magpie and Maggie Farrell’s I Am, I Am, I Am: Seventeen Brushes with Death, A Memoir. Carol added how much she liked Farrell’s The Marriage Portrait. The NY Times 10 Best Books of the Year was the source for two recommendations. From the 2025 list, a non-fiction memoir, Mother Mary Comes to Me by Arundhati Roy and from 2024, Someone Like Us (a novel) by Dinaw Mengestu.

Laura recommended The Antidote by Karen Russell, about a prairie witch who cures mental anguish with the same finesse as an Upper West Side psychiatrist. Joanna liked Andrew Miller’s The Land in Winter, about the cultural shift taking place in England in the 60’s.

I, Claudius by Robert Graves had always been on Carol’s list of books to read. The length intimidated her, and were it not for Lit Club, she wouldn’t have tackled it.

Robert Graves was born in 1895. He received an excellent education; winning scholarships, including to Oxford. He fought in World War I and was severely wounded at the Battle of Somme. He suffered for years from shellshock. His life had been spared, he believed, because fate intended him to be a poet. He earned his living writing, he was the author of 140 publications, the count includes poetry, novels, essays, criticism, short stories, translations. His criticism led to the close reading method, known as the New Criticism. His poetry influenced Ted Hughes, Sylvia Plath, Philip Larkin and Kingsley Amis

He met Laura Riding, a poet, while married to his first wife. All three moved to a house in Majorca. He stayed there from the 1920’s to his death, in 1986, except for 10 years back in England. His romantic attachments and marriages were not as stable.

I, Claudius was published in 1934 to immediate popular and critical success. Claudius was part of a “cruel and debauched ruling class” whose members “sought and maintained power through systematic murder.”  Claudius wrote an autobiography, now lost, which inspired Graves to write this first-person narrative. Graves researched Claudius’ life and times carefully; most events are factual. The inner lives of the men and women in this circle of Roman autocrats and their families are Graves’ imaginative recreation. It is historical fiction.

Claudius was a sickly child. He was lame, possibly due to polio; he stammered, jerked his head, suffered stomach pains. He was reputed to have written over 28 volumes of history while others plotted for power. None of his writing survived. In an era when physical prowess and success in battle was needed to be an emperor, Claudius was believed doomed to obscurity. That Claudius was an incompetent undeserving to become an emperor was the view of 19th century British historian Edward Gibbons, and widely accepted. Graves’ novel challenged that opinion and led to a reassessment of Claudius.

Carol led us skillfully through a maze of poisonings, assassinations, rivalries, incest, executions, and betrayals to the unexpected triumph of Claudius. Graves gave Claudius the following thoughts on becoming emperor:

“No, you would never guess what was passing through my mind. But I shall be frank and tell you what it was, though the confession is a shameful one. I was thinking, ‘So, I’m Emperor, am I? What nonsense! But at least I’ll be able to make people read my books now. Public recitals to large audiences. And good books too, thirty-five years’ hard work in them.’ ”

Wednesday, December 10, 2025

Jacquie Presents A Tale of Two Cities

 

Liberty Leading the People by Eugene Delacroix
Jacquie’s Email 

Hello Literary Ladies! It will be the best of times, it will be the worst of times when next the Literature Club of Hastings-on-Hudson meets, and I will be presenting A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens – From Mr. Audette to Dr. Manette. We will gather at Kathy Sullivan's art-filled home for luncheon at noon. Joanna will ring the bell at 1pm to begin our meeting. The rest, well, we can only hope for the best of endings.

All members, please let our hostess know if you will not be attending, and associates, please let her know if you will be joining us, so she can plan the seating accordingly. I look forward to seeing you all there! Cheerio and au revoir! Jacquie

Frances’ Minutes Twelve members and two associates gathered at Kathy’s warm, welcoming home. She served a delicious turkey chili and more. FYI – the recipe was from the NY Times and perfect for a cold December day.

Joanna rang the bell at 1 PM. Lori said the treasury remained unchanged, at $112.21.

There were many recommendations, we’re all doing more reading now that the weather is cold. From Joanna: Perfection, by Vincenzo Latronico, about digital nomads in Berlin. She showed a book she was reading, a graphic novel, a satisfying find, The Mitford Sisters and Me by Mimi Pond. The Mitfords were her presentation last year. Both Sharon and Jacquie recommended My Friends by Fredrick Backman; Jacquie highly recommended Helen DeWitt’s The Last Samurai, Connie recommended Dorothy Whipple’s Someone at a Distance, a Persephone Newsletter choice and available here in our local library, which many Persephone books are not, sigh. I’ve made wonderful discoveries through this British bookstore’s newsletters but it's hard to find their recommendations in Westchester and buying them from England expensive. More books read and enjoyed: Audition by Katie Kitamura, Antidote by Karen Russell, Writers and Lovers by Lily King

To Jacquie’s presentation, Charles Dickens’ A Tale of Two Cities. Subtitled, a bit mysteriously, from Mr. Audette to Dr. Manette.

It’s been a record year of firsts for the Literature Club. No one has ever begun by singing – but Jacquie did. To the tune of The Wizard of Oz’s “Ding Dong, the Witch Is Dead” she sang her spoof on A Tale of Two Cities, part of a high school project. Lyrics below:
Ding Dong! Syd is dead
The Jacquerie cut off his head
Ding Dong! Sydney Carton’s dead
Lucie’s gone and so is Chuck*
Chuck is safe, just his luck
Ding Dong! Sydney Carton’s dead
He’s gone where Chuck should be
His love for Lucie put his head in jeopardy
Oh no! Poor Sydney Carton
Ding Dong the Derrio!
Blade is high, heads will roll
Poor old soul! Sydney Carton’s dead!

*Chuck is Charles Darney

We should have guessed from Jacquie’s mysterious subtitle that her presentation would be equal parts memories of her high school English class and an appreciation of Dickens’ novel. With a wonderful coincidence, Jacquie’s beloved teacher, Mr. Audette, neatly rhymed with The Tales’ Dr Manette

Jacquie brought in a photo of Mr. Audette in her high school yearbook. Not that her descriptions of him weren’t sufficient for us to understand her admiration, or should I say, crush? Jacquie had been labeled a “brain” and a “band fag” in middle school. These labels followed her to high school, but she adapted to the social hierarchy, escaped the bullying she’d experienced in middle school, and she found her people, her best friends, in her English honors class, the class taught by the dapper Mr. Audette who “spoke with a patrician New England accent – a male version of Katherine Hepburn.” He always “wore a tie and well-polished pointy Italian shoes.”

Mr. Audette allowed the class to do, as a final project, “The Best of Times Revue,” their take on The Tale of the Two Cities. Dickens’ tragic Dr. Manette was renamed Dr. Audette. Jacquie did not doubt but that he was pleased.

Jacquie wondered if she had really understood the first opening chapter in 10th grade – “The language is not easy, and the references are contemporary to Dickens, and the chapter is full of allusions and foreshadowing.”

The novel was published, as were all his novels, in weekly installments, from April to November of 1859. Dickens was a man of extraordinary energy and creativity, writing novels, short stories, articles, travel pieces, essays, letters, editorial notes and plays. He had a wife and 10 children to support, and after leaving his family in 1858, a mistress.

A Tale of Two Cities is unusual among Dickens’ novels. Dickens’ social commentary is present but not central. The gulf between the rich and poor in Pre-Revolutionary France is illustrated in 2 extraordinary scenes. The aristocratic clergyman, Monseigneur, has his daily hot chocolate served by six manservants. In Paris, outside the De La Farges’ shop, a wine cask breaks apart in the street; men and women lap up the wine from the cobblestones. A Tale is a historical romance with fewer characters than his other novels. The story is about the love between Lucie Manette and Charles Darney, the sacrifices made for others by Sydney Carton and Mrs. Pross.

Jacquie learned that Mr. Audette died the summer after her freshman year in college. The obituary did not give a cause. In 1983, it was assumed a death without cause of a 54-year-old man, unmarried and childless, was from AIDS.

Jacquie reached out to her former high school drama teacher, Mrs. Evaul who worked with Mr. Audette for many years. Jacquie hoped to learn more about him, hoping to know what he was like outside of school. Jacquie soon realized Mrs. Evaul was suffering from dementia. There would be nothing new to learn. Jacquie did let Mrs. Evaul know she had wonderful memories of her, of Mr. Audette and her other teachers.

Jacquie was grateful to us for giving her the chance to re-visit 10th grade encounter with A Tale of Two Cities and Mr. Audette.

Respectfully submitted,
Frances Greenberg
Recording Secretary

Wednesday, November 19, 2025

Christine Presents Paradise Lost

Jacquieʼs Email Hello Literary Ladies! It is my delight this morning to be able to remind you that we will be meeting this Wednesday, November 19th for Christineʼs presentation on
Adam and Eve by William Blake
Paradise Lost
by John Milton. We will gather at noon at Joannaʼs gracious home for a potluck lunch. As per usual, she will ring the bell promptly at 1pm to begin our meeting.

Please let our hostess know if you will be unable to attend so she can set out the correct number of seats, which will be unassigned. (I had to get in ONE classroom reference in!)

I donʼt have even a slightly entertaining anecdote to add in anticipation of this week's selection, but that will not stop me from continuing to share!

Throughout my years in school, I seemed to have been plagued by William Blake. Be it an English class, art history class, or even English history class, I seemed to always have had to deal with Blake. I never really cared for Blake, but it seemed to be Blake, Blake, all the time, and I probably would have even argued that Blake had WRITTEN Paradise Lost even though I have never read it! I think of his images when hearing the title of the poem.

Mainly there was that infernal:
Tyger Tyger, burning bright,
In the forests of the night;
What immortal hand or eye,
Could frame thy fearful symmetry?

Cake provided by Christine

The only joy I would get from that poem would be recalling that wonderful line from one of my favorite films, Educating Rita, when Julie Walters argues with Michael Caine that “assonance is getting the rhyme wrong.”

In light of this year's theme, I chose to revisit the Blake illustrations of Paradise Lost and I must admit, in my seasoned state, I find them to be rather astonishing, and I look forward to Christine's presentation immensely to further my newfound appreciation of his work. And how grateful I am to have been so enlightened so as not to have what would likely be a very embarrassing argument about who wrote Paradise Lost, if ever it should come up in conversation!

But I've really digressed here, so I'll stop sharing now! I SO look forward to seeing many of you on Wednesday for Christineʼs presentation on JOHN MILTON and Paradise Lost. For me, it has been much too long! 
x Jacquie


Frances
ʼ Minutes
 Twelve members and 2 associates met at Joanna’s house for a Lit Club first: a potluck lunch. It’s a good alternative to brown bag lunches for emergencies. The scheduled hostess, Diana, had returned the night before from Mississippi. She was caring for her mother who had taken a bad fall. Joanna managed to carve out time between returning from Martha’s Vineyard and supervising two events happening later that evening. Special note must be made of a devil’s food cake supplied by Christine (see photo)

Joanna called the meeting to order at 1 PM. Lori gave the treasurer’s report: $113.12.

Recommendations Lori recommended On the Calculation of Volume
by Danish writer Solveg Valle. Three of the projected 7 volume work have been translated in English. Connie and Jacquie both recommended Liberation, Beth Wohl’s Broadway play about 1970’s feminists.

To Christine’s presentation on John Milton’s Paradise Lost

Christine as Satan

Christine came dressed as a devil. She wore a beautiful pair of long red gloves plus a black cloak with a red lining & horns on her head. A thoughtful choice since Satan is naked in William Bloke’s illustrations, as well as the poem.

Christine was unprepared for how “profoundly” she “would be affected by the poem.” She carried the book everywhere she traveled. Her early Catholic education had taught her about Original Sin. In no way did it prepare her for the beauty and terror of Milton’s language.

In Paradise Lost, she found themes that include “more or less everything worth thinking about.” Despite decades of serious reading, this was her first encounter with Milton’s influential epic.

John Milton was born in 1609. He studied to become an Anglican priest, but was never ordained, he knew his vocation to be poetry. During the Civil War, beginning in 1639, he sided with Cromwell and the Parliamentarians, and was in favor of the execution of Charles I. With the Restoration of 1660, he feared imprisonment or execution. He was protected by powerful friends until a general pardon was declared. Milton spent the rest of his life in London. His major works, Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes were written after he lost his sight. In a painting of imagination and homage, Eugene Delacroix had Milton dictating Paradise Lost to his three daughters. He composed his poems aloud, but his daughters weren’t his scribes. Milton died in 1674.

Christine sampled 10 different Audible recordings of Paradise Lost before she found the one she thought best. The poem was spoken before it was written; reading it aloud was for her the closest way to enter the poem’s spirit.

The poem begins with Satan contemplating another war against heaven. The fallen angels are dissatisfied, bitter about their defeat – they are in hell. Beelzebub shares information of God’s new intention: to create man. He will not be divine like angels; but man will have the power to choose obedience to God. Satan comprehends how to create discord between God and man. He will take the form of a serpent to corrupt the man and woman, to tempt them into disobeying their creator. Eve eats the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge, an action specifically forbidden by God. She is now cursed to die like a mortal being. Adam, loving her, not wanting to be without her, wanting to perish with her, also tastes the fruit.

God had given Adam and Eve free will. Disobedience will be unforgiven. God declares, “In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread / Till thou return unto the ground for thou / out of the ground was taken. Know thy birth / For dust thou art and shalt to dust return.”

Respectfully submitted,
Frances Greenberg
Recording Secretary

Wednesday, November 5, 2025

Sharon Presents Jane Eyre and The Wide Sargasso Sea

Charlotte Brontë
 Jacquieʼs Email Hello Literary Ladies! The Literature Club of Hastings-on-Hudson will be meeting this Wednesday, November 5th at noon at Linda Tuckerʼs warm home to hear Sharon DeLevieʼs presentation: Jane Eyre by Charlotte Brontë, Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys. After luncheon at 1 PM, Joanna will ring the bell to begin our meeting.

One of the many things I love about this yearʼs theme is this idea of re-visiting great literature. For some of us this means re-reading books we might not have fully appreciated at the time of first reading. For others, itʼs tackling big books that are new to them. But with all of the great literature we are exploring this year, I believe thereʼs one thing we all have in common—the sparks of memory and various associations they help kindle in our minds. And, taking advantage of my role as corresponding secretary, this means you all must suffer the sparks and ramblings of mine! (You can certainly stop reading here. All pertinent information has been expressed above.)

I was so excited to learn that Sharon was going to be reading Jane Eyre for the first time. How I love that book! But then I realized I don't remember actually reading Jane Eyre, but I know I did. My Bantam Classic edition is on my shelf with my name written in it with “New York” and “1987” written on the title page. After college and living two blocks from the much-missed Shakespeare & Company on 81st Street, I took it upon myself to read many of the classics I hadn't in high school and college. ($4.50 for a paperback with lettering so small I would be unable to read them today.) The Brontës were top of my list, but it's the turbulent, romantic, and tragic Vilette, Charlotte Brontë's final novel I remember reading more clearly on a bench in Riverside Park. And yet—Jane Eyre!

I first encountered the story of Jane Eyre on channel WPIX where the 1944 Orson Wellsʼs classic film seemed to be on constant rotation, and I watched it through every time it was on. Forget the love story between Joan Fontaine and the still handsome Orson Wells. It was the tragic and intense friendship between Jane and Helen in Lowood that got me every time. How heartbreaking and formative it was for me to watch Jane cruelly lose her first and only friend so early in the film. It was just too much to bear—and I couldn't look away.

It was certainly the love story between Rochester and Jane that caught my imagination later with the book, and I eagerly sought out Wide Sargasso Sea to remain in that world. But I didn't get it! All of the allusions to the action of the book just made no sense at all. I just remembered a lot of churning and roiling sea water. Thankfully I will have Sharon to enlighten me. I still remember my confusion at the time because I felt so dissatisfied and at lose ends in my incomprehension of the book. I wanted the dirt on Berthe and Rochester! Don't cloak it!

But here's the kicker! Moments ago, I had an epiphany! I had gotten myself confused and for whatever reason, thought that Jean Rhys had also written the modern play Antigone which I had loved in my AP English class and was so eye-opening in exploring the power of tragedy. Wide Sargasso Sea was so dense. But I just looked it up and was reminded that Jean Anouilh wrote Antigone, not Jean Rhys, so, mystery solved! All these years later I can finally put that baby to bed! Another score for Lit Club!

Ed Young Day, which has consumed me for the past several months, begins in just a few hours, so I apologize for this very long and rambling reminder. I am just writing this out this morning, and even with the turning back of the clocks, I didn't have time to write a short, condensed version! (I know. When are they ever short and well-edited???!!!)

I look forward to seeing many of you on Wednesday, as well as this afternoon at the library to celebrate all things Ed! x Jacquie

Sharon in costume
Frances’ Minutes Twelve members met at Linda’s house. Our presenter, Sharon, came through the front door, barely, wearing a 19th century gown, puffed out below the waist by a hoop skirt and a petticoat. She admitted that it was unlikely Charlotte Brontë ever wore a hoop skirt but Sharon’s dress certainly set a Victorian mood.

President Joanna rang the bell at 1 PM. Lori gave the treasurer’s report: $113.12. We have given $200 to the Hastings Public Library to replace worn-out board books. Any money left is to be used for additional books for the Young Library, the children’s section named for Ed Young, a 30-year Hastings resident. He wrote and illustrated over 100 children’s books.

Recommendations Influenced by last week’s NYC Marathon, Frances recommended 2 books about walking or running, Hiroki Murikami’s memoir, What I Talk About When I Talk About Running and The Santiago Pilgrimage, Walking the Immortal Way by Jean-Christophe Rufin. Joanna recommended Buckeye by Patrick Ryan, a story of two Ohio families spanning generations and decades. Joanna and Connie have both seen Ragtime, on Broadway, and add up votes to Laura’s previous recommendation. Joanna recommended, a documentary about the assassination of Patrice Lumumba, Soundtrack to a Coup d’Etat, which can be streamed on Amazon Prime or Kanopy. Some of us didn’t know that Kanopy is a free streaming service provided by our Westchester public libraries. It’s wonderful, the film catalog is wide-ranging and huge.

To Sharon’s presentation on Jane Eyre and The Wide Sargasso Sea

Not one of us hadn’t read Jane Eyre. Sharon had read at 16, and now, at 62, she
was rereading it and listening to the audiobook. She thought Rochester a bully, then and now, but her assessment of Jane changed. She appreciated how strongly Jane claimed her right to independence. In the 19th century, this was a show of courage for a petite and impoverished 18-year-old without friends or family.

One could search for the origins of that courage in Charlotte Brontë’s life.

She was born in 1816, in Yorkshire, the daughter of an Irish Anglican minister. Her mother died when she was 5. At 8, Charlotte and three of her sisters were sent to a boarding school for clergymen’s daughter. Conditions were harsh; two sisters died there.

Brontë worked intermittently as a governess, work she found demeaning, writing in letters that she felt treated as “a piece of furniture.” She spent much of her adult life in her father’s parsonage. Her sisters Anne and Emily were also writers. In 1846, the three published a book of poetry, selling only two copies. Unfazed, the following year Charlotte published Jane Eyre, Emily Wuthering Heights and Anne Agnes Grey.

The joy of their success was overshadowed by death. Anne, Emily and their brother Branwell died between September 1848 and May 1849.

Brontë continued to write, publishing an additional three novels. Her emotional life remained fixed in the parsonage. In 1854, she married her father’s curate. She was pregnant when she died the following year.

Jane Eyre was an immediate success. The heroine’s demand for dignity and equality in love resonated with its readership. Brontë’s influence on other women writers was powerful. Virginia Woolf wrote “she had more genius in her than all of us. That shines from every page of her work.”

Sharon selected conversations between Rochester and Jane for us to read. Jane doesn’t see through Rochester’s deceptions but she stands up to his bullying. The madwoman in the attic, Brontë’s creation of genius, destroys Rochester. His desire to marry Jane is revealed as bigamy. The mad wife burns Thornfield Hall down. The fire blinds and maims Rochester.

Jane flees Thornfield Hall after she witnesses the confrontation between Rochester and the woman in the attic. She spends days wandering, hungry, cold until she’s saved by two sisters and their brother. After a couple of plot twists involving the brother proposing marriage to our heroine, Jane improbably winds up a rich heiress. Many of us couldn’t remember this part, probably because the psychological realism of the novel is jarringly suspended.

But we have come to love plucky Jane. With her direct appeal to us – “Reader, I married him” – we are back on Jane’s, and Brontë’s, side.

The woman in the attic, the Creole from Jamaica, haunted Jean Rhys. The Wide Sargasso Sea is her back story, both prequel and critique of Jane Eyre. We read from Edwidge Danticat’s introduction. Rhys was born on Dominica and emigrated to England. The screaming vengeful woman locked up in an English attic was born on a tropical island like Rhys’. Her name was Antoinette, although Rochester called her Bertha, as if Antoinette was too delicate a name for what she had become. She was a young woman when the British outlawed slavery. The plantation economy in Jamaica collapsed. Many English colonists like Antoinette’s family were impoverished. Antoinette’s early life in Jamaica was framed by a mentally ill mother, by a descent into poverty and by a social order that had imploded. Plus, reader, she married him.

Respectfully submitted,
Frances Greenberg

Wednesday, October 22, 2025

Joanna Presents Revisiting The Crucible and John Proctor Is the Villain

Jacquie's Email Hello Literary Ladies! Please excuse this very late reminder that the Literature Club of Hastings-on-Hudson will be meeting this Wednesday, October 22nd at Lori’s sublime home to hear Joanna present on “Revisiting Arthur Miller’s The Crucible: John Proctor is the Villain.” I was completely distracted all day, and I almost didn’t get my homework in on time!
      As per usual, we will be gathering at noon for what we know will be yet another delicious lunch. Joanna will ring the bell at 1 PM to lead our meeting, and then proceed to take us through a brilliantly conceived and unexpected examination of what this year’s theme is all about, turning the tables completely and revisiting high school reading we think we are familiar with, but through the eyes of actual 21st century high schoolers, not our more... mature 21st century ones. This year’s theme was Joanna’s brainchild, so I’m just heartbroken I will not be there to hear her presentation. I will just have to take comfort in the fact that I got to see Kimberly Belflower’s astonishing play with her, and that Frances will be taking notes. Have a wonderful meeting, and I’ll see you all next time! x Jacquie

Frances' Minutes Eleven members and two associates met in Lori’s home on a beautiful October day. Some of us lunched on the deck, some inside. Joanna rang the president’s bell at 1 PM. Lori gave the treasurer’s report: $313.12

We shared our most recent adventures in reading and viewing.

Barbara saw the revival of Hadestown on Broadway; not recommended. Laura recommends Ragtime, also on Broadway now.

Recommended Books Laura: Endling by Maria Reva, long listed for the Booker Prize. Carol reread, with admiration, Joan Didion’s The Year of Magical Thinking. Joanna liked The Correspondent by Virginia Evans, an epistolary novel too late to be considered for 2024-25’s Letters etc. Connie’s favorites are Kiran Desai’s The Loneliness of Sonia and Sunny, two Indian emigrants in the US, and Claire Adam’s Love Forms, about a Trinidad-born woman in London, searching a daughter she gave up for adoption.

Christine, on a trip to Colombia, wanted to read a novel by a local. Not easily done, but she found The Bitch by Pilar Quintana. We wondered if the Spanish title was as insulting as the English - was something gained in translation? Christine advised not reading the Novel Prize winner László Krasznahorkai, describing his work as dark and difficult. This is our member who read 1534 pages (Penguin edition) of Clarissa.

On the invasion of Artificial Intelligence, as told by Carol. Her friend’s book was copy edited by someone (most unlikely) or something (almost certainly) totally insensitive to the text’s meaning. Required days of labor by the author & his spouse to correct. Maxwell Perkins luckily isn’t around to witness this fresh horror.

To Joanna’s presentation: The Crucible by Arthur Miller and John Proctor Is the Villain by Kimberly Belflower.

If the measure of a classic is the ability to reveal truth long after its initial appearance, The Crucible is one. It is the most frequently produced of all Arthur Miller’s plays. Many of us were surprised – not Death of a Salesman or All My Sons? We then re-considered, considering how often it is performed in high schools, perhaps because of the quantity of girls’ and women’s roles.

The Crucible is an allegory about the search for communists in entertainment and government by HUAC (House Un-American Activities Committee) in the early 1950’s, with enthusiastic help from Senator Joe McCarthy. Miller uses the late 17th century Salem witch trials as an analogy. Both events took place during times of political upheavals and social anxiety. Both were about threats from groups whose power, if any, was inflated by hysteria and paranoia.

In The Crucible, a group of girls are glimpsed dancing naked in the woods, with the slave Tituba. Were they casting spells? Or were they under a spell? Salem is riven by the idea that witches are among them, that they are threatened by the Devil and his followers. The girls realize the efficacy of deflecting suspicion of their wild behavior: they have been bewitched. They know who the witches are. They have discovered power and are now using it against those who insulted, demeaned, abused or despised them.

Abigail is among the accusers. She was a servant in the household of John and Elizabeth Proctor. John and Abigail were lovers. He broke off their affair, apologized to his wife, dismissed Abigail. Abigail still wants Proctor; his rejection makes her vengeful. She names him a member of the Devil’s coterie.

John Proctor is brought to trial. Despite his innocence, he is found guilty. He will be hung – unless he admits his guilt and repents. He need only sign his name to a written confession.

He refuses: “Because it is my name! Because I cannot have another in my life! Because I lie and sign myself to lies! Because I am not worth the dust on the feet of them that hang. How may I live without my name? I have given you my soul; leave me my name.”

Audiences of the 1950’s heard the echoes of witnesses in front of HUAC who named others who they attested were communists. Many were black listed in Hollywood; they either never worked again, worked under assumed names, or left the US.

Kimberley Belflower heard another story; an unexplored aspect of John Proctor’s act. Was it really heroism? He was going to leave his now reconciled wife Elizabeth a widow. Elizabeth was pregnant with their third child. John Proctor was protecting his name; what would happen to his family?

“We talked a lot in our rehearsal process that multiple things can be true,” Belflower said. “I think John Proctor is a good man and does all of these incredible moral things. But this other thing is also true. He was awful to every woman in the play.”

John Proctor Is the Villain takes place in a high school class in Georgia. Belflower’s play explores the sexual power plays between a charismatic teacher and his student, refracting John Proctor and his young servant Abigail. We read the play’s climax, the confrontation between Carter Smith, the charming, exploitative teacher, and Shelby, the girl he seduced and abandoned.

Belflower said she did not intend to “cancel” Miller’s play, she wanted to extend a conversation about it. She found an unexplored theme in The Crucible; her play is commentary on the tangle of sex and power lying underneath a classic assumed to be only about politics.

Respectfully submitted,
Frances Greenberg

Wednesday, October 8, 2025

Lori Presents Chinua Achebe

 Jacquie's Email Hello Literary Ladies! Just a reminder, next up on our syllabus is Lori Walsh's presentation on Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe. We will be meeting this coming Wednesday, October 8, at Frances Greenberg's tranquil home. Luncheon will begin at noon, and our meeting will follow promptly at 1 PM.

I often find my thoughts wandering to the past, but this year's theme, as well as my high school yearbook which has found its way next to me at my desk, has been putting me into time sucking reveries. My senior year was the first time AP English was offered in my high school. It was a fantastic class, and next to typing, was the class that most prepared me for college. There were only eight of us in AP English, all girls. Seven of us were already friends. The eighth was Marcie McMahon, who was A CHEERLEADER and REALLY popular! Crossing the social divide as she did was a very unusual thing to do in Roy C. Ketcham High School in Wappingers Falls, New York, but, to our collective biased surprise, she was terrific and funny and SMART. And she liked us too! She not only accepted us, but she helped raise our social status in the school. I'll forever love Marcie and be grateful for her bravery and her friendship, and the seemingly impenetrable barriers she broke down. Her behavior was the most memorable lesson of all.

And I distinctly remember sitting and taking the AP English Lit exam, and one moment in particular. After finishing explicating a poem and realizing I knew what I was doing and feeling really good about myself, I looked up from my desk to where my friend Maria was sitting diagonally across from me and becoming completely distracted by how pretty her hair looked that day. A perfect example of how erratic my thinking process was and still is. And it's SO high school. Sigh.

I can't wait to see you all on Wednesday! x Jacquie

2011 AP English Literature Exam

Frances' Minutes At noon, eleven members and one associate assembled in Frances’ house. Sharon joined us at 1:30 PM, for a Lit Club historical first. She had been held in a lockdown at Sing Sing Prison. She had just begun teaching a class on reading short stories when a lockdown was announced. Her students returned to their cells. She was held in the classroom, without her cellphone, credit cards or money, all not permitted inside Sing Sing. She spent 3 ½ hours bored and hungry despite being within sight of vending machines.

President Joanna called the meeting to order at 1 PM.

Treasurer Lori gave her report: $313.12.

We have donated $99 to the Friends of the Library, who purchased books from the Barkin Library to give to the Yonkers Family Services.

Joanna proposed donating $200 to the Hastings Library. We will request the library replace deteriorating board books in the children’s library. The rest of the donation should be used for more children’s books. Motion passed.

Christine brought a British bookmakers’ list of possible winners of the 2025 Nobel Prize in Literature, along with their odds of winning. Many writers were unknown to us, like Helle Helle at 24/1. Bob Dylan’s precedent put Paul Simon on the list, with the same odds as Stephen King, 49/1 and behind Margaret Atwood at 34/1. N.B. the next day, October 9, Lásló Kraszuaborkai, second on list at 6/1, won.

As usual, some book recommendations: Frances suggested A Fortnight in September by R.C. Sheriff. Jacquie suggested Excellent Women by Barbara Pym. Both exquisitely written novels about the lives of ordinary people, both novels British, the drama low key but affecting.

To Lori’s presentation on Chinua Achebe.

She chose the Nigerian writer because in high school she had never read a novel written by a person of color. She asked how many of us had read Joseph Conrad’s Heart of Darkness in high school; all hands raised. At university in Nigeria, Chinua Achebe also read the Heart of Darkness. The chilling, racist descriptions of Africans in Conrad’s novel deeply disturbed him.

We read a passage from Heart of Darkness. The narrator Marlowe describes an African sailor, feeding coal to the furnace which drives a steamer up the Congo River. The characterization is racism at its dismal worst.

Chinua Achebe was born in 1930, in Igboland, then as now, a part of Nigeria. The British colonization of Achebe’s homeland was thoroughly established during the 1890’s, the decade in which his novel Things Fall Apart takes place. Achebe was raised as a Christian; he was educated in English, from grade school to university.

Through his older relatives, Achebe knew Igbo history and culture unaltered by contact with the British. He knew that the Igbo had a rich oral literary tradition.

He wrote Things Fall Apart, he said, to oppose “the image of Africa as ‘the other world’ the antithesis of Europe and therefore of civilization.”

The novel had a cataclysmic effect on African writers. Wole Soyinka, Nobel Prize laureate and also Nigerian, said it was “the first novel in English which spoke from the interior of an African character rather than as the white man would see him.”

The novel is set in the 1890’s, when the Igbo were still resisting British control. Okonkwo, a man in his 30’s, occupies center stage in Things Fall Apart. He’s physically strong, the champion wrestler of his village. He’s prosperous and respected, he strives to differentiate himself from his ineffective father.

Things fall apart. We are witnesses to tragedy. We might attribute Okonkwo’s downfall to his arrogance, cruelty, overweening ambition, his toxic masculinity. In the Igbo religion, his chi, his spirit which guides his actions and determines his fate, would lead him to ruin.

Both Igbo and Anglo literature share an understanding of a tragic flaw.

Respectfully submitted,
Frances Greenberg
Recording Secretary

Wednesday, September 17, 2025

Frances Presents Don Quixote

 Jacquie's Email: Hello Literary Ladies! It's Back-to-School time which means the first day of the 2025-2026 academic calendar year of the Literature Club of Hastings-on-Hudson is about to commence! This year our area of concentration is “High School Reading Re-Visited.”

Our first session is this Wednesday, September 17th at Joanna’s home. Lunch time will begin at noon, and hopefully the weather will cooperate so all the cool kids can hang out in the back. And to continue with this tortured gag, the bell will ring promptly at 1pm when all are expected to be in their seats with their thinking caps on.

Laura Rice will hand out our schedules for the upcoming year and all present will be asked to answer the question, “What I did on my summer vacation.” In addition, summer reading will be shared with all. After an oral report on our last session (the link to Frances’ blog is below for those who need to review what we covered last year) and a quick exercise with math, Frances will present on Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes.

Members, please let our hostess know if you will not be in attendance and can provide a valid excuse for your absence, and associates who are auditing, kindly confirm if you will be present.

I had the great good fortune of having excellent high school English teachers who shared their love for literature passionately, keeping me engaged whether it was first period 10th grade honors English with Mr. Audette at 7:40 AM or last period 12th grade AP English with Mrs. Wojtazek at 1:28. I wish I remember more of what they actually said and not just what they wore (Mr. Kennedy’s brown suits, Mrs. Evaul’s polyester power blazers...) but I do remember the feeling of being in their classes, developing a joy for a specific kind of inquiry that would stay with me always.

This should certainly be a banner year for our dear sorority! x Jacquie

Christine's Minutes On the seventeenth of September, 2025, while the world-as-we-knew-it appeared to be crumbling, disintegrating and/or deteriorating all around us, it was with enormous pleasure and a great sense of healthy camaraderie, trust, and the love of great literature, that fourteen members and two associates of the Hastings Literature Club gathered in Joanna’s balmy backyard for our first meeting of the 2025-2026 season, “High School Reading Re-visited.” Unlike our lunch fare back in high school, we dined on refreshing gazpacho and a scrumptious plum tart.

By way of demonstrating that we are not slaves to tradition, Madame President rang the bell at 1:10 PM.

Our treasurer, Lori, reported that we are flush with $488.66. Of that amount, $99.50 will be given to the Friends of the Library for books. Joanna suggested that as our gift this year, we give them $100 for board books.

Fresh from all that leisurely summertime reading, several members had books to recommend:

Endling Maria Reva
The Accompanist Nina Berberova
The Emperor of Gladness Ocean Veong
Autobiography of Red, Anne Carson
Isola Allegra Goodman
The Cara Black Mystery series with investigator Aimée Leduc
Kristin Lavransdatter Sigrit Undset
Your Steps on the Stairs Antonio Muñoz Molina
It Can’t Happen Here Sinclair Lewis
Mansfield Park Jane Austen
Memory Piece Lisa Coe

Linda shared with us the syllabus of her daughter’s AP English class at the Williamstown High School in Massachusetts. The reading list was exceptionally well-chosen and wide-ranging and there was general agreement that we would all have enjoyed, and learned much from, the class.

Vocabulary-wise, we had the dubious pleasure of learning the definition of kakistocracy: government by the least suitable or competent citizens of a state. The word was coined in the 17th century and comes from the Greek words: kákistos and kratos.

To begin our year of filling in the lacunae of our early years’ reading, what better way to start than with Don Quixote, the masterpiece of Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra? Frances began her presentation by pointing out that while one may not have actually read Don Quixote, most everyone feels that they know him, his sidekick Sancho Panza, the valiant steed Rocinante, and their adventures “tilting at windmills.” Many of us could sing the songs from the Broadway musical, The Man of La Mancha. And we all use the eponymous adjective ‘quixotic.’

Frances happily discovered that in 1952, Vladimir Nabokov, while a visiting professor at Harvard, was compelled to teach Don Quixote. His first reaction to the book was quite negative, because of all the violence. Correctly so, as the novel is full of violence and cruel mockery. But over time and multiple readings, Nabokov came to admire the lively dialogue, and his collected lectures are now canonical.

Published in 1605, Don Quixote is considered to the first modern novel, and one of the longest. Though at 430,269 words, it does not approach the voluminous verbiage of Clarissa, with its 950,000 words. (Enough of such quibbling and braggadocio.) The novel was an immediate success. It was translated into English in 1612, and we know that Shakespeare read it.

Cervantes’ life was itself the stuff of adventure novels. He was born in 1547, to a moderately prosperous family. His father was a barber-surgeon, and his mother came from rural landowners. At some point the father gave up barbering and looked for other work. He spent time in debtors’ prison – as Cervantes himself would later do.

Cervantes was living in Madrid when, at 19, he published four poems. But as any poet can tell you, that did not pay the bills. Thus, he worked as a household manager for a Roman cardinal, enlisted in the Spanish Army, and in 1571 fought in the Battle of Lepanto, where he was wounded, and ultimately lost the use of his left hand. While sailing back home to Madrid, his ship was captured by Barbary pirates, and he was sold into slavery in Algiers. After five years in captivity, he was ransomed. Back in Spain, Cervantes continued to write and held various government positions. However, financial ‘irregularities’ landed him in debtors’ prison for a year. He wrote that it was during that year that he conceived of the idea of Don Quixote. (Recalling Dickens’ Micawber, I am wondering if there were a few delusional characters in that prison to provide inspiration.) He was 58 when he published Don Quixote. And 68 when he published the second part.

On the enduring fame and relevance of Don Quixote, Frances’ pointed to Quixote’s desire to ‘do good.’ Living in a time of a morally and ethically corrupt government as we do, readers find his idealism is a beacon. It may be that our own idealism could be described as quixotic.

What exactly was the nature of Don Quixote’s madness? With the pure intentions of a (fictive) knight errant, he manages to cause a lot of grief and trouble for others. Having read the romances of knight errantry, Quixote polishes his great grandfather’s suit of armor, saddles up Rocinante and departs pleasant La Mancha in search of occasions to do good. Along the way he hires Sancho Panza, as he realizes that all knights errant need a loyal squire.

Like his squire, Don Quixote, Sancho Pancho is a comic creation of genius. Faithful, realistic, and unencumbered by fantasies of knight errantry, he remains loyal to the end. He can see clearly that the helmet of Mambrino is in fact a barber’s basin, and that the fierce giants are windmills, but Quixote is immune to such naysaying.

Quixote also decides that, as a knight, he must be devoted to a noble and pure woman, and he fixates on Dulcinea. She is a woman from his village whom he does not know, and so finds it possible to imagine her very imaginary beauty and virtue.

For readers, it is a sad comeuppance when, after many bungled adventures, Quixote goes home, and there his niece and housekeeper, along with the village priest and barber, pull all the culpable volumes of knightly adventure from his library, and burn them. Then they completely wall off his library, so that upon waking, Quixote is shocked to find that his library has disappeared.

Members read aloud from Guy Davenport’s introduction to Nabokov’s Lectures on Don Quixote, from Nabokov’s lecture, and from the novel itself: classic scenes of the windmills, of Mambrino’s helmet, of the blanket-tossing and more. The combination of humor and pathos was powerful. Frances chose to use the much-praised 2003 Edith Grossman translation, which we all appreciated.

It was an afternoon to remember, especially when we need an antidote to our so-called reality.

Respectfully submitted,
Christine Lehner, substituting for Frances Greenberg

From a member