Search This Blog

Wednesday, February 16, 2022

Connie Presents Joe Orton

Jacquie's Email
Dear Literary Ladies: I fall back on this quote by the Portuguese poet Fernando Passeo whenever I need to, say, rationalize the fact that I read 72 books last year but my basement is still a mess. (Somehow, I am able to ignore the fact that I have many friends better read than I who have very well-organized basements AND attics... and have also knit a few sweaters in that time...) Yet what we all know is that if anything, literature helps us understand life - meet it head on with greater empathy and understanding of other people. We are not ignoring life in literature; we are maybe just finding ourselves in more satisfying locales and with more interesting characters experiencing more agreeable situations than we might currently be enjoying. And examining literature through the biography of the authors has also inspired, taking us from the (extra)ordinary to the sublime! And now we have Connie's presentation on the playwright Joe Orton to look forward to. Please be on the lookout for the Zoom link from Sharon. Until then, Jacquie

Christine's Minutes
It was frigid outside, but thirteen members and one associate of the Literature Club were warm, inside our rectangles of pixels, and warmly entertained, on February 16, 2022. During our pre-meeting time to catch up, we discussed books, the delights of emerging from COVID, and the wonderful news that Diana has one liberal relative in Mississippi.

President Fran Greenberg rang the bell at 1:06, and announced that we will again be recording the program. Christine read the minutes, and they were accepted. Lori reported that our treasury remains unchanged. As for new business, Fran suggested that we discuss when, and how we will go off Zoom and resume meeting in person. Our next meeting, being our annual meeting, will be a good time for this discussion.

Then, without further ado, it was time to settle down for some serious entertainment and Connie’s program about the English writer, Joe Orton. With her usual aplomb, Connie dressed for the part with a faux leather jacket and scarf.

Connie began her program with the biographer, not the subject: and we learned that John Lahr could himself warrant a biography, so interesting is his life. The son of Bert Lahr, the Cowardly Lion portrayer so well-known to crossword puzzlers, John Lahr was for many years the drama critic for The New Yorker. He also wrote novels, and biographies of several actors and playwrights, including his father, Dame Edna, Frank Sinatra, Noel Coward, and Tennessee Williams. His writing has won many awards and he is considered one of the greatest living literary biographers. Lahr is now eighty years old, and lives in London with his wife, Connie Booth, better known to some of us as Polly in Fawlty Towers.

Joe Orton died in 1967 at the age of 34.

Lahr’s biography, Prick Up Your Ears, came out in 1978. Additionally, he has edited Orton’s complete plays, and his very compelling diaries. Arguably, Lahr has played a key role in assuring Orton’s importance as a playwright.

Orton was born, John Kingsley Orton, on January 1, 1933, in the Saffron Lane Estates, part of council housing in Leicester. He was the first child of Elsie and William Orton. William was gardener, and quite aloof from his family. Elsie worked as a machinist, stitching underwear from 8 am to 6 pm. Yet she always ran home at her lunch break to cook lunch for her 4 children. She was strong, vivacious, and surprisingly prudish. She was often cruel to her children, yet she recognized Joe as a gifted child, and sent him to a private school, where his teachers found him to be semi-literate. All he cared about was the theatre, and at 16 he left school to pursue that ambition.

In 1949 he joined the Leicester Theatre and decided to apply to RADA. He took dance lessons and sought advice from everyone and anyone. He studied elocution with Mme. Rothery, whose lessons and coaching would make a real difference for Orton. With another of her students he performed a scene from Midsummer Night’s Dream, and won 3rd place. Then, with an uncharacteristically generous contribution from the Leicester Educational Committee, Orton applied to RADA. On his 18th birthday he took the train to London. He auditioned for RADA and got in.

He moved in with a fellow actor, Kenneth Halliwell. Kenneth was older than Joe, better educated, and withdrawn. His mother died as a result of a wasp sting, when Kenneth was 11; he was in his early 20s when his father committed suicide. (This kind of background that should set off alarm bell.) Halliwell and Orton continued to live together after RADA, and in 1959 Halliwell bought a 10 x 17 bedsit. In that small space, they read, wrote, and lived frugally. All their books came from the public library, and they began to subtly change or make collages of book covers. Their collages are now regarded as works of art, but in 1962 the response was less enthusiastic. Halliwell and Orton were caught in a police sting, and they were sentenced to six months in prison, in separate prisons. As with so many things, they reacted differently. Orton found the experience of prison oddly liberating.

In 1963, the BBC accepted his play, The Ruffian on the Stair. His next play Entertaining Mr. Sloan was a huge success. The American premier was directed by Alan Schneider, who – I feel compelled to point out – also directed the American premiere of Waiting for Godot and lived in Hastings on Hudson.

Orton’s next play, The Good and Faithful Servant, was poignant and angry; it was followed by the “boulevard farce” Loot. Loot was originally panned, but after several rewrites, it re-opened in 1966 and was a triumph. All along, as his career was ascending, Orton continued living with Kenneth in the bedsit. They often traveled to Morocco together and reveled in the sexual freedom they found there. But Kenneth’s career was going nowhere, while Orton’s was soaring. He was approached by Brian Epstein to rewrite a Beatles’ script. It was never produced, but by then he was writing What the Butler Saw.

Meanwhile, in December 1966 Orton began to keep a journal, and kept it almost daily until his death. In it he detailed his many sketchy sexual encounters, as well as arguments with Halliwell. Then, on a hot day in August 1967, Halliwell bludgeoned the sleeping Orton to his death. He then took an overdose and killed himself. His suicide note directed the reader to Orton’s diaries, “especially the latter part.” Alas, the previous nine days’ worth of diaries have been removed, by person or persons unknown. After this, Orton was more famous for being murdered by his lover, than for his plays. But that would change. His last play, What the Butler Saw, brought farce to high art.

Club members read several selections from John Lahr’s Prick Up Your Ears, from Orton’s own diaries, and saw several photographs of the plays. We had another Literature Club first – pictures of male nudity. Then we were treated to a snippet of the brilliant What the Butler Saw, on YouTube.

As Connie pointed out, there is no butler in the play.

Respectfully submitted,
Christine Lehner, Recording Secretary

Wednesday, February 2, 2022

Joanna Presents Patricia Highsmith

Joanna DID warn us to expect something a little different!
Jacquie's Email

Hello Literary Ladies! Just a reminder that we will be meeting this Wednesday, February (!) 2nd at 12:45 pm on Zoom for Joanna's presentation on the talented Ms. Patricia Highsmith. I have a sense that this is going to be a lot of fun! Until then, stay safe and warm! xJacquie

Christine's Minutes

On February 2, 2022, thirteen members and one associate, each of us inhabiting our allotted rectangle of visibility, joined in via Zoom, from sunny Florida to Hastings on Hudson to wildlife-rich Ossining.

In what has become a pandemic tradition, we all reported on our recent doings, readings, and concerns. Today’s topics ranged from the difficulty of discarding unwanted furniture, especially old dark wood furniture, to the ever-reliable pleasures and comforts of Jane Austen, to the low cost (by New York standards) of a cleaning lady in Mississippi, to bald eagles riding ice floes on the Hudson, to a rescued Maine coon cat called Kiki.

President Fran Greenburg rang the bell at 1:19, and thanked Sharon for being our zoom hostess. Laura Rice (filling in for Christine) read the minutes for our last meeting. Lori Walsh reported that the treasury is flush with $265.11.

Then, in a first for our Literature Club, the program was taped, so that Jacquie, who is in Poughkeepsie taking care of her mother, will be able to listen to Joanna’s talk at a later time. Clearly, our comfort level with Zoom technology has come a long way since our first on-line meeting back in March 2020.

Joanna Reisman began her program on Patricia Highsmith by intrepidly going straight to the great elephant that is in the room every time we discuss literary biography. What difference does it make when we know the life story of an author? Should it make any difference? Is our reading of any text enlightened by our understanding of the author’s character? Should not a work of literature be read for its own merits? And she did all this without mentioning Derrida.

One aspect of Highsmith’s biography that intrigued Joanna, was the writer’s unsavory reputation as “racist, anti-Semitic, lousy to the women she was in love with and those who were in love with her.” Again, the question: do we want to read the work of someone so wretched? Should we reject all art created by nasty artists? And what about authors, such as Jeanine Cummings, who dare to write about people, minorities or oppressed peoples in particular, without being a member of that group? But wait, isn’t the whole point of writing fiction to put oneself into the life, and shoes, of another, of others? Joanna bravely addressed these thorny issues.

Back to Patricia Highsmith: Her parents were already divorced, when she was born in 1901 in a Texas boarding house owned by her grandmother. She spent her first three years with her Calvinist grandmother. Then she met her soon-to-be stepfather, Stanley Highsmith. They disliked each other instantly. The new family moved to New York City, then back to Texas, and back to New York again. One summer she attended a girls’ camp near West Point and wrote in her diaries of the pleasures of skinny dipping.

For all her adult life, Highsmith kept a diary, and a cahier. The diaries were confessional, while the cahiers were used to note story ideas, and random thoughts. All of these were written in a mélange of languages. Both sets off diaries are now housed in the Patricia Highsmith Papers at the Swiss Literary Archives in Bern.

In 1942 Highsmith left Barnard and began participating in the NYC life of lesbian bars, galleries, communists, writers, and artists. Her first serious love affair was with the artist, Allela Cornell. She had uncountable love affairs all her life, mostly with woman but sometimes men. She was very prone to falling in love, often for the briefest of periods, and the aftermath was often rather unpleasant.

It is a source of great pride for our club that the idea for her famous first novel, Strangers on a Train, came while she was walking with her parents in Hastings on Hudson. Or is it?

During the 1940’s, Highsmith spent time at Yaddo, doing exactly what residents at Yaddo are famous for doing: writing, drinking, and having sex.

In 1951, the rights to Strangers on a Train were bought by Alfred Hitchcock and it became a very successful film.

Her next novel, The Price of Salt, was remarkable in being about a lesbian relationship that does not end badly. It was based on her real love affair with Virginia Catherwood. But Highsmith’s publishers rejected the manuscript. It later came out with a small press under a pseudonym. In 1953, Bantam brought it out as a 25¢ lesbian pulp edition. Not until the Bloomsbury edition of 1990 was the novel published under Highsmith’s own name. Then in 2015 there was a very successful movie version.

Around 1950 Highsmith moved to Europe. One day in Italy she saw a young man in sandals on the beach in Positano, and conceived of the character Ripley, and the concept of the Ripley novels. The Talented Mr. Ripley has been twice filmed, once with Alain Delon, and in 1999 with Matt Damon as Tom Ripley. Joanna explained how the Ripley novels were more satisfying than the movies, as they got us right inside Ripley’s head. He “is a con artist, a conniver, you find him reprehensible and yet you are rooting for him at every turn.” He is a rare hero who is essentially amoral.

A Suspension of Mercy was written in England, where Highsmith had gone to be near her lover at the time, Caroline Besterman. She otherwise lived primarily in France and Switzerland. Suspension was followed by four more Ripley novels, for a total of 22 novels and many short stories. Throughout her life, she drank heavily. Highsmith claimed to prefer animals to humans, and she was especially fond of snails, and often had several in her handbag. Eventually, she ended up in Switzerland, for tax reasons. She died there of lung cancer, in 1995.

Joanna concluded her program by explaining how Highsmith has, and most likely will, survive cancel culture: there was no hypocrisy. She never pretended to be a nice person without prejudices. On the contrary, she reveled in her honestly lived life. She was herself unapologetically awful, and she wrote compellingly about vile and obsessed characters.

Members read selections from a variety of books, including her biography by Joan Shenkar, and Highsmith’s novels.

Respectfully submitted,
Christine Lehner, Recording S
ecretary

 

From a member